<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Income Security for All &#187; ordinary citizens</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.incomesecurityforall.org/category/ordinary-citizens/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.incomesecurityforall.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 15:07:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Banks, bailouts, and income security</title>
		<link>http://www.incomesecurityforall.org/banks-bailouts-and-income-security</link>
		<comments>http://www.incomesecurityforall.org/banks-bailouts-and-income-security#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 17:57:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven Shafarman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bank crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ordinary citizens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic stimulus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[popular support]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.incomesecurityforall.org/?p=913</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The logic of income security for all &#8211; and bailing out people, not banks &#8211; is illustrated, though only indirectly, by a front page story in today&#8217;s New York Times.
The story is about community banks, and merits front-page coverage because it&#8217;s an aspect of the situation that&#8217;s been generally ignored. Community banks are mostly fine. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The logic of income security for all &#8211; and bailing out people, not banks &#8211; is illustrated, though only indirectly, by a front page story in today&#8217;s New York Times.</p>
<p>The story is about community banks, and merits front-page coverage because it&#8217;s an aspect of the situation that&#8217;s been generally ignored. Community banks are mostly fine. They&#8217;re earning profits, not failing. They haven&#8217;t gotten bailout money from our federal government. <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/12/business/12small.html?ref=business">Here&#8217;s</a> the story.</p>
<p>The logic of income security for all is that government is supposed to promote the general welfare, the general interests, not special interests. The recent bank bailouts directly aided only a select group of very special interests, the biggest Wall Street finance companies, notably AIG, Goldman Sachs, Bank of America, and Citibank.</p>
<p>Those bailouts were pushed through Congress and sold to the American people as necessary to &#8220;save the economy.&#8221;  That phrase, as the whole sorry bailout episode demonstrated, is often a code for &#8220;subsidize big corporations.&#8221; A main reason big corporations get bailouts and subsidies is their ability to produce campaign contributions and lobby both Democrats and Republicans.</p>
<p>What if AIG and the rest had been allowed to fail?</p>
<p>The Times story suggests something many of us were saying at the time: Government could have stimulated economic activity and recovery by supporting individual citizens and community banks. With financial support from the government, community banks could have expanded their lending and promoted local economic activity. We would be enjoying real, perhaps rapid economic recovery from the bottom up, instead of the current top-down, tenuous, tepid drift.</p>
<p>This is the logic of income security for all. Stop thinking in abstract terms about &#8220;the economy,&#8221; &#8220;the banks,&#8221; and even &#8220;jobs.&#8221; Start, instead, focusing directly and concretely on the concrete and local, especially on individual people.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m reminded of some lines by the poet William Blake: &#8220;One who would do good must do it in minute particulars. General good is the plea of scoundrels, hypocrites, and flatterers.&#8221;</p>
<p>To learn more about these ideas, please visit the home page and other material on this web site, <a href="../../../../../">www.IncomeSecurityForAll.org</a>.</p>
<p>You can read the complete plan for income security, the idea and how we can implement it, in <em><a href="http://tendrilpress.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=article&amp;id=22&amp;Itemid=24">Peaceful, Positive Revolution,</a> </em>which is available from Tendril Press.</p>
<p>I hope you&#8217;ll also comment on this blog. And please help spread the word.</p>
<p>Steven Shafarman</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.incomesecurityforall.org/banks-bailouts-and-income-security/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama and us</title>
		<link>http://www.incomesecurityforall.org/obama-and-us</link>
		<comments>http://www.incomesecurityforall.org/obama-and-us#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 14:47:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven Shafarman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ordinary citizens]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.incomesecurityforall.org/?p=888</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The past week&#8217;s news, filled with hype and hoopla about President Obama&#8217;s first 100 days in office, has me wondering about something: Is Obama putting us to sleep? Are we expecting him to solve our problems for us?
By &#8220;us&#8221; and &#8220;we&#8221; and &#8220;our&#8221; in those questions, I&#8217;m referring to ordinary Americans, those who used to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The past week&#8217;s news, filled with hype and hoopla about President Obama&#8217;s first 100 days in office, has me wondering about something: Is Obama putting us to sleep? Are we expecting him to solve our problems for us?</p>
<p>By &#8220;us&#8221; and &#8220;we&#8221; and &#8220;our&#8221; in those questions, I&#8217;m referring to ordinary Americans, those who used to be called the &#8220;silent majority.&#8221;</p>
<p>When we read about Obama, when we hear him on the radio and see him on television, we should remember something: America is a democracy. We citizens are his bosses. His job is to follow our directions.</p>
<p>Our job is give him clear directions. That means we have to be active citizens. We can&#8217;t just go to sleep and expect him to know and do what&#8217;s right.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not enough to just complain, criticize, and protest. That&#8217;s particularly true these days, when some protests are like the anti-tax &#8220;tea parties&#8221; of two weeks ago. Those were mainly PR events for the Republican party and its friends at Fox news.</p>
<p>The reason I write this blog and work so hard to promote the idea of Citizen Dividends is that I want to live in a society based on real justice for all, real freedom for all, real dignity for all. Too often, it seems to me, justice, freedom, and dignity are just rhetoric.</p>
<p>Justice, freedom, and dignity are denied or impaired when people lack an income, enough for food and shelter at least. Income security for all is necessary.</p>
<p>But we can&#8217;t just sit back and wait for Obama to solve our problems for us. Indeed, if we expect him to do so, we&#8217;re just reinforcing our sense of powerlessness. And we&#8217;re actually making it less likely that there will be any real progress on climate change, health care, education reform, and so on.</p>
<p>What do you think? Do these ideas make sense to you? Do you see the connection between income security and democracy?</p>
<p>To learn more about these ideas, visit the home page and other material on this web site, www.IncomeSecurityForAll.org.</p>
<p>You can read the complete plan, the idea and how we can implement it, in my book, <a href="http://tendrilpress.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=article&amp;id=22&amp;Itemid=24">Peaceful, Positive Revolution</a>, which is available from Tendril Press.</p>
<p>I hope you&#8217;ll also comment on this blog. And please help spread the word. That&#8217;s how real change happens, from individuals talking to our friends, family members, neighbors, co-workers.</p>
<p>Steven Shafarman</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.incomesecurityforall.org/obama-and-us/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
